Final answer:
Critics of evolution from Intelligent Design Theory argue against the sufficiency of natural selection, but the scientific consensus supports evolution. Moreover, the claim that evolution is 'just a theory' misrepresents the robust, scientific nature of theories. Alternatives to evolution, like Intelligent Design, lack scientific validity and are not legally teachable as science in U.S. public schools.
Step-by-step explanation:
Criticisms of Evolution by Creationists and Scientific Responses
One of the criticisms of evolution put forward by proponents of Intelligent Design Theory is the argument that natural selection cannot explain the complexity of life. However, the scientific community widely supports the theory of evolution, with 97% of scientists in relevant fields affirming species evolve according to a 2009 Pew Research poll. Scientific societies like the American Association for the Advancement of Science have also backed this position, demonstrating that evolution is not a controversial topic among biologists.
Another misconception is that "evolution is just a theory" in the everyday sense, implying it's a mere guess. This contrasts with the scientific definition of a theory, which is a well-tested and validated explanation of facts. The theory of evolution has undergone rigorous testing and revisions, similar to other scientific theories such as the theory of gravity or the theory of relativity, and it remains the most accepted explanation for the diversity of life on Earth.
The idea that other theories should be taught alongside evolution in public schools is another point of contention. This is problematic because there are no alternative scientific theories that are viable. The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that teaching religious beliefs, such as special creation or intelligent design, in public schools is illegal. It's important to uphold scientific standards in education and ensure that only testable, falsifiable, and evidence-backed theories are taught.