Final answer:
Traditional strategic control is sequential and hierarchical, focused on following a predetermined plan, whereas contemporary strategic control is interactive, adaptable, and considers detailed aspects within a more holistic framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to strategic control within organizations and asks for a comparison between traditional and contemporary approaches. Traditional strategic control, as mentioned, is typically sequential in nature, implying a top-down, step-by-step process that follows a predefined plan or pattern. This approach would emphasize hierarchical roles within an organization and often deal with large-scale issues.
Contemporary strategic control, on the other hand, is more interactive. It involves constant feedback and adaptation based on current situations and detailed aspects. This approach reflects the complexities of modern environments where strategies must take into account a vast array of variables, including the actions of competitors and partners, similar to a chess game where each player's move is influenced by the other's. Also, in contexts such as the military or politics, the need for adaptability and strategic superiority is evident. Contemporary strategic control, akin to transformational leadership, emphasizes a holistic view and effectiveness through adaptability.