89.6k views
3 votes
Roger is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. Roger's employer has created a flexible spending account for medical and dental expenses that are not covered by the company's health insurance plan. Roger had his salary reduced by $1,200 during the year for contributions to the flexible spending plan. However, Roger incurred only $1,100 in actual expenses for which he was reimbursed. Under the plan, he must forfeit the $100 unused amount. His after-tax cost of overfunding the plan is $65.

A) True
B) False

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The statement is true. Roger saved money by overfunding the flexible spending plan.

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the given information, the statement is True.

Roger's salary was reduced by $1,200 for contributions to the flexible spending plan. This means that Roger's taxable income was reduced by $1,200. Since Roger is in the 35% marginal tax bracket, the amount of taxes he saved due to the reduction in taxable income is $1,200 * 35% = $420.

However, Roger only had $1,100 in actual medical and dental expenses for which he was reimbursed. Since the excess contribution of $100 is forfeited and not used for reimbursements, Roger effectively missed out on the tax savings for this amount. Therefore, the after-tax cost of overfunding the plan for Roger is $100 - $420 = $-320.

Since the after-tax cost is negative, it means that Roger actually saved money by overfunding the plan. Therefore, the statement is True.

User Sean Holden
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.