Final answer:
The statement is false. 'Problem plays' do not strictly delimit good and evil to prevent moral ambiguity; instead, they challenge audiences with complex, morally ambiguous situations to provoke thought and ethical deliberation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement provided for evaluation as true or false is, in fact, FALSE. The problem in a "problem play" often revolves around a societal or moral dilemma, but contrary to the statement, these plays usually do not present good and evil in strictly delimited ways. Instead, problem plays are known for having morally ambiguous situations that challenge the audience to think critically about ethical issues. They do not seek to prevent moral ambiguity; instead, they highlight and explore it, encouraging audiences to contemplate the complexity of ethical decision-making.
The nature of conflict within plays is multi-layered, and obstacles faced by characters are often mirrors for larger societal or ethical dilemmas. Figures like Socrates questioned the moral order, and orators and playwrights have explored the complexity of morality, often demonstrating that absolutes in moral thinking are both unrealistic and potentially harmful. This is underscored by the ongoing process of reviewing moral thinking, where the dialectical process helps refine ethical principles without insisting on moral absolutes.
The Problem of Evil, the Euthyphro Dilemma, and notions of false dichotomy all highlight the complex nature of ethical deliberation and reflect the nuanced approach that problem plays tend to take towards issues of morality.