Final answer:
The Foolish Almanak likely began with elements indicating it was written by someone unlearned, which aligns with literary themes of ignorance and superstition common in satirical works or works critiquing society's understanding of knowledge.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Foolish Almanak began with an indication of being authored by someone who is perceived to be uneducated or unlearned. This could be deduced from the stylistic choices or content that suggests a lack of formal knowledge or deliberate pretense of ignorance for satirical purposes. Many works of literature use a narrator or an implied author who intentionally appears less knowledgeable to create a certain effect or to criticize certain aspects of society.
As seen in various literary works, such as those mentioned in the given excerpts, authors often explore themes related to ignorance, superstition, and credulity, as in the work of Columella or the Paracelsus reference in the LibreTexts. The quote about soothsayers and witches, as well as references to other historical or fictitious works, reflect on the perceived wisdom or folly of individuals and their susceptibility to superstition and fantastical ideas.
Therefore, the content, style, and thematic exploration of the Foolish Almanak likely aligned with works of its time that dealt with such concepts, indicating it was perhaps written in a satirical tone or with the intent to challenge perceptions of knowledge and intellectual authority.