Final answer:
Justice Scalia believed that constitutional rights are crucial in protecting against the wrongful conviction of the innocent, following the principles of the Sixth Amendment and established Supreme Court precedents.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student has asked about Justice Scalia's view on constitutional rights and evidence of innocence. Justice Scalia's view the most aligns with option C, that constitutional rights should protect against conviction of the innocent. It's important to recognize that the Supreme Court has historically given attention to the protection of the rights of those accused of a crime to ensure a fair judicial system—a stance that is echoed in the significant decisions like Miranda v. Arizona that required suspects to be read their rights. This reflects a broader constitutional principle that the accused are to be assumed innocent until proven guilty, as emphasized by the Sixth Amendment. Therefore, Justice Scalia would likely support the idea that constitutional protections are in place to ensure that those who are innocent are not wrongfully convicted, even if there is evidence suggesting innocence.