Question

What is the rule/holding Ross v. Moffitt? What prior decision did it clarify?

A) Ross v. Moffitt determined that defendants have the right to counsel at all stages of the criminal process, clarifying the precedent set by Gideon v. Wainwright.

B) Ross v. Moffitt established that defendants have the right to a speedy trial, clarifying the precedent set by Strickland v. Washington.

C) Ross v. Moffitt concluded that defendants have the right to counsel during plea bargains, clarifying the precedent set by Betts v. Brady.

D) Ross v. Moffitt affirmed that defendants have the right to remain silent, clarifying the precedent set by Miranda v. Arizona.

Answer 1

The rule/holding in Ross v. Moffitt is that defendants have the right to counsel at all stages of the criminal process, clarifying the precedent set by Gideon v. Wainwright.

Step-by-step explanation:

The rule/holding in Ross v. Moffitt is that defendants have the right to counsel at all stages of the criminal process, clarifying the precedent set by Gideon v. Wainwright.

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court held that all defendants have the right to an attorney and must be provided one by the state if they are unable to afford legal counsel.

Therefore, the correct answer is A) Ross v. Moffitt determined that defendants have the right to counsel at all stages of the criminal process, clarifying the precedent set by Gideon v. Wainwright.