Final answer:
In New York Times v. Sullivan, the plaintiff offered three bases for finding the Times published the allegedly defamatory advertisement with actual malice. The timing of the publication is NOT one of them.
Step-by-step explanation:
In New York Times v. Sullivan, the plaintiff offered three bases for finding the Times published the allegedly defamatory advertisement with actual malice. The journalist's background, the content of the advertisement, and the sources used for the article were all considered as factors to support the claim of actual malice. The timing of the publication is NOT one of the bases provided by the plaintiff in this case.