Question

The federal appeals court said in Pippen v. NBC Universal Media the false report Scottie Pippen had filed for bankruptcy was not defamatory per se because:

a) Pippen was not a public figure
b) NBC Universal issued a retraction
c) The report was not widely circulated
d) Pippen's financial status was public knowledge

Answer 1

In the case of Pippen v. NBC Universal Media, the false report claiming Scottie Pippen had filed for bankruptcy was not defamatory per se due to several factors.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of Pippen v. NBC Universal Media, the federal appeals court determined that the false report claiming Scottie Pippen had filed for bankruptcy was not defamatory per se. This decision was based on several factors:

1. Pippen was not a public figure.
2. NBC Universal issued a retraction.
3. The report was not widely circulated.
4. Pippen's financial status was public knowledge.

These factors contributed to the court's conclusion that the false report did not meet the criteria for defamation per se.