145k views
4 votes
Difference between good samaritian law and bystander ruler

a) Their scope of protection
b) Their jurisdictional boundaries
c) Their applicable penalties
d) Their evidentiary requirements

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

Good Samaritan Law provides legal protection to those who provide assistance in emergencies, while Bystander Rule does not. The two differ in jurisdictions, penalties, and evidentiary requirements.

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference between Good Samaritan Law and Bystander Rule can be summarized as follows:

  1. Scope of Protection: Good Samaritan Law provides legal protection to individuals who provide reasonable assistance in an emergency situation, whereas Bystander Rule does not offer any legal protection to bystanders who fail to intervene.
  2. Jurisdictional Boundaries: Good Samaritan Law is applicable within specific jurisdictions or countries, while Bystander Rule is a broader concept that can be applied universally.
  3. Applicable Penalties: Good Samaritan Law typically exempts individuals from civil liability for their actions in providing assistance, whereas Bystander Rule does not impose any penalties but may lead to societal criticism or moral responsibility.
  4. Evidentiary Requirements: Good Samaritan Law may require the individual providing assistance to act in good faith and without expectation of compensation, while Bystander Rule does not have specific evidentiary requirements.

User EoinS
by
7.8k points