Final answer:
Conflict theorists argue that IQ tests are biased because they do not account for the learning and communication differences in individuals with disabilities, such as those who might use Facilitated Communication (FC), thereby not allowing a fair demonstration of their intelligence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Advocates for Facilitated Communication (FC) often suggest that the clients cannot be tested due to ethical concerns and the belief that traditional testing methods do not accommodate the unique challenges faced by individuals with severe communication disabilities. FC is a method where a facilitator supports the hand or arm of a person with disabilities in navigating a keyboard or pointing device. One of the reasons why conflict theorists see IQ tests as being biased is because they believe such tests do not give children with learning disabilities, including those who might use FC, a fair chance to demonstrate their true intelligence. The argument follows that these tests are designed primarily for neurotypical individuals and may not be suitable for assessing the cognitive abilities of those whose modes of communication and learning differ significantly from the mainstream.
According to conflict theory, IQ tests could perpetuate existing social inequalities by failing to recognize the potential and skills of individuals who learn and communicate differently. This perspective emphasizes the need for a more inclusive approach that recognizes the diversity of human cognition and intelligence, rather than relying solely on conventional standardized testing which may not capture the true abilities of people who rely on facilitated communication