102k views
1 vote
Does a physician have an ethical duty to treat even if they didn't have a legal duty to treat?

A) Yes
B) No
C) Only in emergencies
D) Only if the patient can pay a high fee

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

A physician has an ethical duty to treat even if they don't have a legal duty to treat. This includes emergencies and regardless of the patient's ability to pay a high fee.

Step-by-step explanation:

A physician has an ethical duty to treat even if they don't have a legal duty to treat. The primary goal of medicine is to provide care and promote the well-being of patients. This ethical duty is based on the principle of beneficence, which means that physicians are obligated to act in their patients' best interest.

For example, if a person is in a critical condition and seeks medical help, a physician should provide treatment regardless of their legal obligation. In emergencies, providing immediate care is crucial to preserve the patient's life and prevent further harm or suffering.

It is important to note that a physician's ethical duty to treat extends to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay a high fee. The principle of justice requires that medical care be accessible to all individuals, regardless of their financial means. Physicians should not prioritize financial considerations over providing necessary care to patients.

User Yclian
by
8.5k points