Final answer:
False, Security through obscurity is not a reliable security strategy, especially as a sole measure. It is considered a weak line of defense and is not recommended for securing communication or systems. The correct stance is to use a layered security approach.
Step-by-step explanation:
Security through obscurity is the concept where a system's security relies on its design or implementation remaining unknown or secretive. This approach suggests that if attackers do not know how a system works, they are less likely to find its weaknesses. However, this is generally considered an inadequate and unreliable security strategy, especially as the only line of defense. When applied to communication, for example, relying solely on obscure methods to hide information could lead to significant risks, as once the method is uncovered, no robust security measures are in place to protect the data.
The correct answer to the question, "Security through obscurity is something that you should rely on for securing communication or systems?" is 2) False.
While obscurity can add an extra layer onto existing security measures, it should never be the sole strategy relied upon. The consensus in security best practices is to employ a layered approach, often referred to as 'defense in depth,' where multiple security mechanisms are layered to protect the communication or system. This way, if one measure fails, others are in place to continue providing protection.