36.8k views
5 votes
Which of the following is true of aluminum toxicity in patients receiving long-term parenteral nutrition?

1: The clinical manifestations of aluminum toxicity are specific and sensitive
2: Aluminum toxicity is the primary etiology of parenteral nutrition-associated bone disease
3: Increased risk of aluminum toxicity exists in the setting of renal failure or iron deficiency anemia
4: Modern manufacturing practices have eliminated the risk of aluminum toxicity

User Zeeali
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Aluminum toxicity is a risk in patients with renal failure or iron deficiency anemia undergoing long-term parenteral nutrition; clinical manifestations are not specific. Manufacturing practices have reduced but not eliminated aluminum risk.

Step-by-step explanation:

Regarding aluminum toxicity in patients receiving long-term parenteral nutrition, the following statement is true: Increased risk of aluminum toxicity exists in the setting of renal failure or iron deficiency anemia. This is because when the kidney function is compromised or when there is iron deficiency, the body's ability to excrete aluminum is reduced, leading to its accumulation. However, the clinical manifestations of aluminum toxicity are not specific and sensitive, which means they can overlap with symptoms of other conditions and may not be immediately attributable to aluminum toxicity. While aluminum toxicity has been associated with the etiology of parenteral nutrition-associated bone disease, it is not considered the primary cause as multiple factors can contribute to this condition. Lastly, even though modern manufacturing practices have reduced the level of aluminum contamination, they have not completely eliminated the risk of aluminum toxicity.

User Ana Franco
by
8.4k points