Final answer:
When evaluating a subject with no clear winner based on the set criteria, breaking down the criterion into separate components provides a detailed and nuanced analysis, allowing for a more informed decision.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a clear winner is not obvious within a set of criteria, it is helpful to divide the criterion into separate components. This method, which could be likened to the classification and division strategy, allows for a more granular analysis. By examining each component individually, you can identify the key qualities that contribute to the overall assessment of the subject under consideration. For instance, if the topic is evaluating alternative energy sources, you might break down the criteria into economic viability, environmental impact, and sustainability. This precise assessment can lead to a more informed decision, especially when the separate components are analyzed in the context of how they relate back to the larger subject.
Let's take the example of assessing female leads in romantic comedies. Instead of evaluating the criterion of 'lead character appeal' as a whole, you might assess separate aspects such as the character's relatability, depth, and evolution throughout the movie. By breaking down the criteria, each aspect can be given attention and weighting according to its relevance and importance to the larger subject of the movie's success. This method provides a nuanced understanding that might be obscured when considering the criterion as a monolithic whole.