Question

Which U.S. Supreme Court ruling stated that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requirement that individuals purchase health insurance was constitutional but the requirement that states expand Medicaid was not?

a) Phillips v. Martin Marietta
b) NLRB v. Weingarten
c) National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
d) None of the above

Answer 1

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius upheld the individual mandate of the ACA as a tax, but ruled that the Medicaid expansion could not be enforced upon states by withholding existing Medicaid funds.

Step-by-step explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling that stated that the requirement for individuals to purchase health insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was constitutional, but the requirement for states to expand Medicaid was not, is c) National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius.

The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the individual mandate as a constitutional exercise of Congress's taxation powers. However, it limited the ACA's provision to expand Medicaid, ruling that the federal government could not withhold existing Medicaid funds from states that refused to comply with the expansion. This ruling was critical in determining the extent of the ACA's implementation across the United States.

The individual mandate provision requires all Americans to have insurance or pay a penalty, aligning with the broader goals of the ACA to provide access to affordable health insurance to all Americans.