Question

All but one are true about the history of indigenous peoples mobilization in Latin America?

A.Zapatista uprising of 1994 in Chiapas opposed North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
B.State policies and public discourse till the 1990s discouraged indigenous identification
C.The 1989 International Labor Organization's (ILO) Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention 169 failed
D.Successful indigenous mobilization took place in Ecuador, Bolivia etc. in the 1990s
E.indigenous rights movement was born transnational

Answer 1

The incorrect statement about the history of Indigenous peoples' mobilization in Latin America is that the ILO's Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention 169 failed. It was actually a significant success in recognizing and protecting Indigenous rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement about the history of indigenous peoples' mobilization in Latin America that is not true is C. The 1989 International Labor Organization's (ILO) Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention 169 failed. This Convention is in fact considered a significant success in terms of establishing an international framework that recognizes and protects the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples.

Indigenous movements in Latin America have a profound history marked by struggles against colonial and later national powers. Key events that signify this struggle include the Zapatista uprising of 1994 in Chiapas, Mexico, which opposed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) due to its devastating economic impact on Indigenous agricultural practices.

Traditionally, state policies and public discourse discouraged indigenous identification, but successful indigenous mobilizations took place in countries like Ecuador and Bolivia in the 1990s. Furthermore, the Indigenous rights movement was indeed transnational from its inception, with global connections and support networks being fundamental to its sustained development and impact.