Final answer:
Gymnasiums and churches are more likely to fail during an earthquake due to their unique architectural features and construction materials. Family homes, on the other hand, are constructed with more flexible materials and simpler structural configurations, making them less susceptible to collapse.
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer to this question lies in the structural design differences between gymnasiums, churches, and family homes. Gymnasiums and churches typically have larger open spaces and higher ceilings compared to family homes. These unique architectural features make them more susceptible to collapse during an earthquake due to the increased weight and stress they need to bear.
Furthermore, gymnasiums and churches are often constructed with materials that are less flexible and more brittle, such as heavy masonry and concrete. These materials lack the ability to withstand the lateral forces generated by an earthquake, leading to the failure of roofs and other structural elements.
In contrast, family homes are often constructed with more flexible materials, such as wood or lightweight steel, which can absorb and dissipate the energy of an earthquake more effectively. Additionally, smaller and simpler structural configurations of family homes provide better load-bearing capacity, reducing the risk of collapse.