Question

Sandel argues that if the moral individualist vision of freedom is right, then the critics of official apologies have a point.

a.true
b.false

Answer 1

Sandel's critique of the moral individualist vision relates to a broader philosophical discussion on ethical relativism, compatibilism, and the search for a third alternative to absolutism and relativism.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sandel's argument regarding moral individualist visions of freedom and official apologies is tied to a broader philosophical debate that also considers challenges to ethical relativism and the search for universal ethical principles. In the realm of moral philosophy, compatibilism presents a stance that freedom of choice or deliberation is essential for moral responsibility.

However, compatibilism also faces criticism for relying on social efficacy as the basis for moral justification, which may not always align with moral truths. Philosophers continue to grapple with the conflict between moral absolutism and cultural relativism, seeking a third alternative that rejects both extremes.

This ongoing philosophical endeavor hints at the complexity of establishing a universally accepted moral framework, highlighting that the justification of practices like official apologies cannot be adequately assessed through the lens of moral individualism alone, because such perspective might not address the collective moral dynamics involved.