Final answer:
Jeremy Bentham did not advocate for natural rights; rather, he viewed rights as a creation of the state and believed that discussing natural rights without legal context invited chaos, which contrasts with other philosophers who supported the concept of inalienable natural rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Jeremy Bentham was a huge advocate of natural rights is false. Bentham was a proponent of utilitarianism and contended that rights are a creation of the state, not something that exists outside the confines of civil society. This stands in contrast to thinkers like Locke and Rousseau who argued in favor of natural rights being inalienable and existing independently of government and laws. Bentham believed that discussing natural rights outside of the legal context was to invite chaos and lawlessness, as he considered such rights to be rhetorical nonsense. His view represents a utilitarian perspective on the role of the state and its relation to individual rights.