Final answer:
Kant emphasis on motives as central to morality is incorrectly characterized in the statement; Kant actually considers the motive of duty to be essential for the moral worth of an action.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim that Kant argues that a person's motive should not matter when determining the morality of an action is false. Immanuel Kant's philosophy underscores the importance of a person's motives when evaluating the moral worth of an action. Kant's key ethical principle, the categorical imperative, suggests that an action is moral only if it can be universalized as a law that everyone could follow. For Kant, the morality of an action is firmly rooted in the intention or motive behind it – meaning actions are deemed moral if done out of a sense of duty, aligned with good will, and without any ulterior motives. This stands in contrast to utilitarianism, which focuses on the consequences of actions rather than the intentions behind them.