Final answer:
Fredrick Taylor's Scientific Management approach emphasizes efficiency and productivity, but it is criticized for creating repetitive, isolating work environments, discouraging innovation, inflexibility, fostering large bureaucracies, and reducing worker incentives to improve work practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The disadvantages of Fredrick Taylor's Scientific Management approach, also known as "stop-watch management", include a number of critical issues. First, it created a work environment where the nature of their work was highly repetitive and isolated, causing difficulty for those accustomed to more collaborative, skill-based labor. The approach focused on maximizing productivity and efficiency, often at the expense of worker well-being and personal interaction.
Additionally, Taylorism is critiqued for its tendency to discourage new ideas and for having little flexibility on a day-to-day basis. Workers often felt they had become little more than cogs in a machine, particularly because Taylor's approach increased the speed of work and imposed strict regulations on workers' methods. This resulted in large bureaucracies within factories and a lack of incentive for workers to exert extra effort or improve their working conditions.
Ultimately, while Taylorism may have led to productivity gains and lower consumer prices, it was unpopular among many workers and led to strikes due to increased managerial authority and decreased autonomy over personal workflow.