Final answer:
The comparison between the salaries of the lowest-paid members of a corporation and the CEO's salary measures relative poverty, indicating income disparity and an inability to achieve the societal average standard of living.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing the salaries of the lowest-paid members of a corporation with the salary of the CEO, we are discussing a measure of relative poverty. Relative poverty does not necessarily imply that individuals lack basic necessities. Instead, it indicates a disparity in income and an inability for certain individuals to achieve the average standard of living that prevails in their society. In this context, people are considered to be in relative poverty when their income is significantly lower than the average, making it difficult for them to maintain a standard of living that is considered acceptable by the majority of the population.In contrast, absolute poverty refers to a more severe form of deprivation, where individuals do not have access to basic necessities such as food, clean water, and shelter. This type of poverty measures whether a person can meet their basic needs for survival, which transcends societal standards and focuses on the essentials for living.Therefore, the comparison between low-end salaries and CEOs' earnings within a corporation primarily involves an analysis of income inequality and relative poverty, which helps to illustrate economic disparities within that entity.