Final answer:
In Twain's satire, women might perceive men as unfeeling due to their lack of emotional concern for animals, contrasting with women's empathetic stance. This view is supported by literature on women's ethics of care, which promotes emotional engagement in moral reasoning.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Mark Twain’s satire of male and female stereotypes, he suggests that women might view men as unfeeling because their lack of emotional consideration for animals contrasts with the deeper empathetic connection that women often share with them. This disparity in attitudes towards animals and sensitivity could be seen as an extension of Twain’s critique on societal norms and gender expectations.
Examining the evidence from various literary sources that discuss women’s ethics of care, it stands out that women have been historically recognized for their emotional attunement and empathetic capacities. This contrasts with masculine traits that are typically associated with emotional detachment, hence reinforcing the perception of men as unfeeling in the realm of animal suffering. The philosophical discourse on the ethics of care suggests that this male tendency to eschew emotion in moral judgments is seen as a deficit by those who value emotional engagement as an integral part of ethical reasoning.
Thus, when contemplating the views on men’s attitudes in Twain’s satire, option 3, unfeeling, appears to align with the critical perspective that men lack the compassionate response women demonstrate towards the plights of animals and, by extension, towards fellow humans as well in some narratives.