Final answer:
The Pepsi candidate wins due to the Coca-Cola candidates splitting the vote among themselves, allowing a unified Pepsi voter base to secure a victory for their single candidate. The correct option is A) Pepsi.
Step-by-step explanation:
The slogan "How about a nice _____" is associated with a Pepsi advertising campaign. However, the question posed is not directly related to the slogan but rather to a hypothetical scenario involving an election for Soft Drink Commissioner.
In this scenario, despite there being four candidates from the Coca-Cola party against only one from the Pepsi party, the Pepsi candidate wins in a landslide. The anticipated reason for this outcome is that the multiple Coca-Cola candidates compete with each other for Coca-Cola voters, fragmenting their potential vote base.
In contrast, all individuals preferring Pepsi unite behind their single candidate, consolidating their votes and leading to a victory that does not represent the majority's preference.
In the election for Soft Drink Commissioner, the presence of multiple Coca-Cola candidates and only one Pepsi candidate divided the Coca-Cola voters' preferences among the four candidates. On the other hand, all voters who preferred Pepsi had only one candidate to choose from.
This led to the Pepsi candidate winning in a landslide, despite the initial indication of a strong preference for Coca-Cola among the voting population.
The correct option is A) Pepsi.