Final answer:
The damages to the truck aren't covered under Jack's policy because his tow truck isn't specifically described for Physical Damage coverage. Option '(C) No. Jack's tow truck is not "specifically described" for Physical Damage (i.e. Collision and Other Than Collision) coverage.' is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jack's insurance policy covers damages to vehicles listed explicitly for Physical Damage coverage, and his tow truck isn't specified under Collision or Other Than Collision coverage. Even though the accident happened with his employee, Mel, driving the truck, the lack of specific description for coverage on Jack's policy for that particular vehicle leaves the damages uninsured. Symbol #1 under Garagekeepers coverage doesn't apply here as the tow truck itself isn't explicitly covered for Physical Damage.
Therefore, despite the collision being caused by an employee, Jack can't claim the damages under his policy due to the absence of the tow truck's specific description for Physical Damage coverage.
Correct Answer: (C) No. Jack's tow truck is not "specifically described" for Physical Damage (i.e. Collision and Other Than Collision) coverage.