Question

How are demagogic arguments of identity and credibility typically described?

a) Open to compromise
b) Based on solid evidence
c) Impervious to disproof
d) Focused on policy issue

Answer 1

Demagogic arguments of identity and credibility are typically described as impervious to disproof. They focus on appealing to emotions and personal beliefs rather than presenting solid evidence or engaging in open compromise.

Step-by-step explanation:

Demagogic arguments of identity and credibility are typically described as impervious to disproof. This means that these arguments are resistant to being proven wrong or invalidated. They often focus on appealing to emotions and personal beliefs rather than presenting solid evidence or engaging in open compromise.

For example, a demagogue may use identity politics to sway public opinion, relying on shared group identity to build support. They may also use claims of credibility, such as personal experience or qualifications, to establish trust and legitimacy. These tactics can be effective in mobilizing a specific audience, but they can also hinder constructive dialogue and prevent the exploration of diverse perspectives.