Final answer:
The realist worldview in international relations prioritizes state security and power balance, with critiques noting its possible marginalization of global cooperation and overemphasis on distrust among states. Realism is often considered overly focused on military strength and cautious diplomacy. Socialist realism, despite its name, is an entirely different concept specific to Soviet art and ideology.
Step-by-step explanation:
Realist Worldview in International Relations
The realist worldview of international relations suggests that states are the central actors in the international system and conduct their policies primarily with the objective of maintaining state security. Fundamental to this theory is the notion of power and the balance of power among states, which is crucial for the maintenance of world order. Realists believe that states operate within an anarchic international system where no central authority exists to enforce order, compelling states to rely on their own capabilities to ensure security and survival.Realism encounters criticism for potentially underplaying the extent to which international cooperation and non-state actors influence global politics. Critics argue that an overemphasis on power politics might ignore the significance of international institutions and normative structures that can mitigate conflict and promote stability.Criticisms of realism also touch upon its perceived cynicism, as realists assume states are inherently self-interested and cannot be trusted to adhere to agreements without coercion or self-benefit. The realist emphasis on military preparedness and cautious diplomacy is seen as a double-edged sword—one that could lead to peace through deterrence or escalate tensions towards conflict.