Final answer:
Kim might have thought -105 was the slope by misinterpreting the coefficient of x in the equation 165 - 105x + 3y = 0. The accurate slope is found by dividing the coefficient of x by the coefficient of y, which results in a slope of 35, not -105.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kim might have incorrectly thought that the slope of the line represented by the equation 165 - 105x + 3y = 0 was -105 because she misinterpreted the coefficient of the variable x as the slope.
However, in the standard form ax + by = c, which in her case would be -105x + 3y = -165 after rearrangement, the slope m of the line is actually the negative coefficient of x divided by the coefficient of y, which is m = 105 / 3.
Therefore, the correct slope is 35, not -105. The slope indicates the change in y (weekly profits) for every one unit change in x (the number of lawns she tends in a week).