Final answer:
Health care agencies are phasing out jacket restraints in favor of more humane treatment methods to avoid physical and psychological harm, aligning with patient-centered care principles. This reflects a broader commitment to safety, respect, and empowerment in health care settings.
Step-by-step explanation:
Many health care agencies are moving away from the use of vest (jacket) restraints in a shift towards more humane and ethical treatment practices. This transition is based on a growing recognition of the potential physical and psychological harm that can be caused by restraints. Jacket restraints are associated with increased risks of injury, as well as negative emotional effects, including feelings of humiliation and helplessness. Rather than relying on restraints, many health care providers are now focusing on alternative methods of care that prioritize the dignity and autonomy of patients.
These changes reflect an evolving understanding within the medical community that patient care should maximize safety while respecting individual rights. The use of restraints is increasingly viewed as a last resort, only to be used when absolutely necessary to prevent harm to the patient or others. This shift away from jacket restraints is paralleled by a broader movement within health care towards patient-centered care, which emphasizes individualized treatment plans and values the input of patients and their loved ones.
Overall, the decline in the use of vest restraints represents a commitment to prioritizing patient safety, respect, and empowerment within health care settings, thereby fostering an environment where patients can receive care with greater respect for their basic human rights.