Final answer:
Persuaders are better than aggressors because they rely on credibility, and expertise, and appeal to reason and emotion to foster genuine, voluntary change in attitudes and behaviors, unlike aggressors who use force and may encounter resistance.
Step-by-step explanation:
A persuader is considered better than an aggressor because persuasion is a process that seeks to change attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors through communication, often appealing to reason and emotions.
One important factor that makes a persuader more effective is the credibility of the speaker. If a speaker is credible and trustworthy, or if they have expertise on the topic, they are more likely to persuade others compared to less credible speakers. Furthermore, persuasion often leads to a more genuine and lasting change in attitudes and behaviors because it involves convincing individuals to change their perspectives willingly rather than using force.
Conversely, an aggressor may use coercion or force to impose their will, which can lead to resistance and a lack of genuine commitment. Persuaders use principles such as message subtlety, audience attention and intelligence, self-esteem, and age to craft communications that are more effective. Ultimately, persuasion is not about overpowering the other party but about engaging with them meaningfully and fostering an environment where change is embraced voluntarily.