Final answer:
The claim that damages due to human errors in security systems are less than those caused by natural disasters is FALSE, as human errors can lead to substantial damages and are often unpredictable, making them a significant risk.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that "Damages to security systems caused by natural disasters are minimal when compared to the damages due to human errors" can be considered FALSE. Studies in human factors psychology, such as the one conducted by Bruno & Abrahão (2012), have shown that human errors can lead to significant issues in information security. For instance, increased cognitive demand on operators can result in more frequent misidentification of security incidents, which can have considerable consequences, such as the Target data breach in 2013. On the flip side, natural disasters, while certainly capable of causing damage to technological infrastructure, such as the