Final answer:
The response to whether God created humans to rule on God's behalf is considered true within certain religious and historical contexts, particularly those rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions and the concept of the Divine Right of Kings where rulers were seen as God's representatives. Philosophical shifts have occurred over time, with some thinking moving towards human reason as the basis for government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether God creates human beings to rule on God's behalf can be said to be True from the perspective of certain religious and historical contexts. In Judeo-Christian traditions, as illustrated in biblical scripture, humanity is often seen as stewards of the earth, with a directive to rule and take responsibility for the creation as representatives of the divine. This idea aligns with the notion of the Divine Right of Kings, where rulers were thought to be directly appointed by God and that their authority was sacred.
Pivotal to this topic is the understanding of the Great Chain of Being, a hierarchical structure of all matter and life, which was believed to have God at its pinnacle, overseeing and dictating the order of existence. Furthermore, thinkers like Tertullian posited that government should be based on biblical revelations rather than human reason, reinforcing the idea that divine will was paramount in structuring human governance. However, in philosophical discourse, such as the writings of Thomas Hobbes, there is a shift towards human reason in the establishment and operation of government.
On the other hand, there is also the perspective that human beings are completely responsible for their actions and governance, without divinely ordained authority. This is echoed in sentiments that express doubt or the view that God does not interfere with human affairs, leaving humans to bear the consequences of their choices and to be the architects of their own morality and governance structures.