Final answer:
The issue with Eliminative Materialism being self-refuting is its logical inconsistency. It denies mental states while asserting a claim, which is a mental state, causing a self-contradiction.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question at hand is considering the criticism that Eliminative Materialism is self-refuting. This theory purports that only material substance exists, denying the existence of any kind of spirit or mind as a separate entity. However, critics argue that this stance falls into a logical inconsistency, which is option B. The materialist viewpoint contends that beliefs, desires, and other psychological states simply do not exist as we conceive them, but this raises an issue: the claim itself is a psychological state, thus seemingly negating its own assertion.
Dualism, by contrast, supports the coexistence of mind and body as separate entities. Philosophers like Plato and Descartes have been proponents of such essentialist views, believing in the existence of the self or the soul. Materialism faces challenges such as explaining intentionality and purpose behind actions without invoking any non-material causes.
Given these contradictions and difficulties in justifying the stance of Eliminative Materialism through logic and experience, the answer to the question 'What is the issue: Eliminative Materialism is self-refuting?' is indeed B) Logical inconsistency.