Final answer:
The issue with the statement that Folk Psychology has good predictive and explanatory powers is the lack of empirical evidence to substantiate its claims. Scientific inquiry values rigorous testing and observable evidence, leading to skepticism about unverified folk psychology predictions and explanations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which issue is related to the statement that Folk Psychology has good predictive and explanatory powers. The correct answer among the given options, considering the provided references, is A) Lack of evidence.
Folk psychology, while popular, often lacks the necessary empirical evidence that would verify its claims scientifically. Both psychological and sociological explanations have historically questioned religious and supernatural experiences due to their unverifiable nature, seeking instead to understand phenomena through verifiable empirical means.
This aligns with the scientific approach of placing value on evidence that can be rigorously tested and observed. As noted by theorists including Freud and Durkheim, and echoed in cultural anthropology, psychology, and political science, empirical evidence is the cornerstone of scientific inquiry.
Furthermore, as empirical data often relies on correlational rather than causal relationships, the predictive power of any theory, including folk psychology, must be scrutinized thoroughly before being accepted.