Final answer:
Eliminativism denies the intuitive certainty of the existence of the mind, aligning with option B, stating that traditional mental states will be dismissed as neuroscience progresses.
Step-by-step explanation:
In response to the question How does eliminativism reply to the intuitive certainty of the existence of my mind taking priority over other considerations?, eliminativism primarily denies the existence of the mind as a distinct entity with mental states as they are traditionally conceived. This philosophical stance aligns with option B from the choices provided. Eliminativists argue that common-sense understandings of mental states – beliefs, desires, and experiences – are part of a flawed 'folk psychology' that will be replaced as neuroscience advances. This position is counter to the intuitive certainty of the existence of one's mind, which is often viewed as foundational to one's experiences and identity.
When discussing mental states and the mind-body problem, it's essential to understand different positions such as materialism, which asserts that only physical substance exists, and idealism, the belief that only spiritual substance exists. In contrast, dualism posits that both the mind and the body exist as separate substances, a view famously held by René Descartes. However, eliminativism rejects these traditional frameworks, claiming that as our scientific understanding evolves, the concepts related to mental states may turn out to be illusory.
Eliminativism is one of several philosophical approaches to the mind-body problem. While it confronts our deep-seated intuitions and challenges the notion of mental states as we understand them, it also provokes debates about the adequacy of our current psychological and philosophical theories regarding consciousness and self-awareness.