Final answer:
Eliminativism rejects the self-refutation by arguing that the refutation itself is based on folk psychological concepts which are to be discarded. They propose a new paradigm for understanding mental states that does not rely on these traditional concepts, thereby circumventing accusations of self-refutation.
Step-by-step explanation:
In addressing how eliminativism, as a philosophy of mind, responds to the accusation of being self-refuting, option C, which suggests that eliminativism rejects the self-refutation, is likely the most accurate. Eliminativism advocates would argue that the very concepts of absolute truth or objective knowledge—such as those claiming 'no objective knowledge' or 'no absolute truth'—are part of the folk psychological framework they advise us to discard. Consequently, when eliminativists claim that such folk psychological concepts do not accurately represent psychological phenomena, they are not making a self-refuting statement; rather, they are suggesting a paradigm shift in how we understand mental states.
Claims of self-refutation as directed at pragmatism or other perspectives like dualism, often arise due to a misunderstanding or misapplication of the theories. For example, a theory may be perceived as self-refuting if it relies on the very concepts or structures it seeks to undermine—however, proponents of such theories can and do provide nuanced responses that attempt to circumnavigate the alleged self-refutation.