Final answer:
A philosopher may object to humor by arguing that it frustrates understanding, that it's not rational to harm others through jokes, or that humor is gratifying and therefore not rational.
Step-by-step explanation:
A possible philosopher's objection to humor could be that it frustrates understanding. Humor often relies on surprise or incongruity, which can disrupt logical or rational thinking, making it difficult to fully comprehend the joke. However, this objection would only apply to certain types of humor and doesn't encompass all aspects of humor.
Another objection could be that humor is not rational to harm others through jokes. Some philosophers may argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally cause harm or offense through humor, as it goes against ethical principles.
Lastly, an objection could be that humor is gratifying and therefore not rational. This objection suggests that humor serves no higher purpose or rational function, and is merely a shallow form of entertainment.