Final answer:
Non-objective art is art that does not represent recognizable subjects, focusing instead on the elements of art itself. Critiquing non-objective art includes examining the formal qualities and materials used, as well as considering broader critical theories and the cultural context of the artwork.
Step-by-step explanation:
Non-objective art refers to artworks that do not depict recognizable subjects or objects. Instead, these works focus on the elements of art itself, like color, shape, and line, without attempting to represent the external world.
When critiquing non-objective art, one should focus on the materials, the formal qualities of the composition, and the potential emotional or conceptual impact these elements might evoke in viewers.
It involves thinking critically about how the work might communicate to a wide audience, including the meaning it might hold in a current societal context influenced by social developments such as feminism, globalism, multiculturalism, and identity politics.
Critiquing non-objective art should move beyond the usual historical or iconographic analysis to incorporate critical theories, including feminist and postcolonial critiques. This acknowledges that while the meaning of art is subjective, it is also reflective of its cultural and historical context.
Therefore, critiquing non-objective art involves careful consideration of the artwork's own qualities and the conditions of its creation, while also engaging with contemporary discourses that may shape its interpretation.