Final answer:
The prevalence of a particular theory of humor—Incongruity, Relief, Superiority, or Benign Violation—varies by cultural context and social trends, with Relief Theory being universally relevant as it facilitates unity and tension release.
Step-by-step explanation:
The theory of humor most widely recognized and seen in today's world is a subject of debate, but the Incongruity Theory, the Relief Theory, the Superiority Theory, and the Benign Violation Theory all have significant footholds in different cultural contexts. Anthropological research, such as that done by Murdock, suggests that humor serves as a universal mechanism to release tension and foster unity, indicating the Relief Theory's pervasive relevance. This is because humor allows for the safe expression and release of sentiments that could otherwise disrupt the social fabric.
Yet, the Incongruity Theory, which posits that humor arises when there is a mismatch between expectations and reality, also resonates broadly across diverse cultures, as does the Benign Violation Theory, which suggests that we find humor in situations that benignly violate social norms. Although each theory has its merits, the exact prevalence of one over the other can vary depending on cultural context and current societal trends.