Final answer:
Option 1, which states that humor is idle, is NOT considered one of the negative ethics of humor. While humor can sometimes be seen as nonproductive, it is not inherently negative in an ethical sense, unlike irresponsible, hostile, or manipulative humor.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which of the following is NOT considered one of the negative ethics of humor? When analyzing the negative aspects of humor, it is crucial to recognize that certain types of humor can indeed be damaging or harmful to social relationships and individual feelings if used irresponsibly. The options provided present different takes on how humor could potentially be perceived negatively.
Humor being idle suggests that it does not serve a productive purpose, which is not inherently negative from an ethical standpoint. On the other hand, describing humor as irresponsible or hostile implies that such humor can hurt individuals or society by being careless or aggressive. Lastly, manipulative humor indicates a use of humor to influence or control others, which can be ethically questionable.
Option 1: Humor is idle is the correct answer; it is NOT considered a negative ethic of humor. While all forms of humor may not serve a serious purpose or lead to productivity, this does not necessarily imply a negative ethical value. Humor can be a benign way to bring joy or laughter without entailing malice or irresponsibility.