225k views
3 votes
Indirect channels are able to achieve the lowest out-of-pocket marketing and sales expenses?

A) Ture
B) False

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Indirect channels do not always have the lowest marketing and sales expenses.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is False.

Indirect channels, such as wholesalers or retailers, may have lower out-of-pocket expenses compared to direct channels, such as selling directly to customers. However, they also incur additional costs, such as commissions or fees, which can offset the savings. Therefore, it's not accurate to say that indirect channels always achieve the lowest out-of-pocket marketing and sales expenses.

User Anand C U
by
7.6k points