116k views
2 votes
Which of the following ways of evaluating a performance task is most likely to document criteria to be met and levels of quality?

A.A rubric
B.A questionnaire
C.A student-teacher conference
D.A student self-assessment.

User Galaxyan
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

A rubric is the most likely way to document criteria and levels of quality when evaluating a performance task. It provides a clear framework for evaluating performance and ensures that expectations are understood by both the teacher and the student.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most likely way to document criteria to be met and levels of quality when evaluating a performance task is by using a rubric. A rubric is a scoring guide that clearly outlines the expectations and criteria for a task, and provides descriptions of different levels of performance. It allows both the teacher and the student to have a clear understanding of what is expected and how the work will be assessed.

Unlike a questionnaire, which gathers information or feedback, a rubric provides a framework for evaluating performance. A student-teacher conference can be helpful for clarifying expectations and providing individualized feedback, but it may not have the same level of objectivity as a rubric. A student self-assessment can be valuable for promoting reflection and self-awareness, but it may not provide the same level of documentation and external perspective as a rubric.

User Kriem
by
8.3k points