Final answer:
The Electoral College can depress voter turnout and misrepresent the popular will due to its winner-takes-all system, giving disproportionate influence to smaller states. This often leads to campaigns focusing primarily on swing states and ignoring 'safe' states.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether the Electoral College leaves some out of the election/voting process can be complex. Those who argue that it should be reformed believe the system depresses voter turnout and fails to represent the popular will. The methodology behind allocating electors gives smaller states a disproportionate influence compared to larger states, which can lead to a scenario where the candidate with the minority of the popular vote wins the presidency.
Additionally, because most states have a winner-takes-all approach, where the winner of the popular vote in the state takes all its electoral votes (except in Maine and Nebraska), this can result in 75% of the states being ignored in election campaigns. The focus tends to be on 'swing states' that could go either way, leading to a feeling of being left out among voters in 'safe' states where the outcome is more predictable. Hence, the argument that the Electoral College does not ensure fair representation for all citizens is strong.
Due to the reasons discussed, including lower voter turnout in the U.S. relative to other countries and the indirect nature of electing a president, the claim that the Electoral College represents a fair and unbiased system is often contested. People's belief that their vote does not count within the system is one reason for this disengagement.