Final answer:
The statement suggests a structuralist view of language emphasizing form and structure over functional, social contexts, but this is a limited perspective. Sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology instead recognize language as deeply ingrained in social and cultural contexts, seeing it as a multidimensional construct influenced by both biological predispositions and environmental factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement under consideration seems to highlight a structuralist approach to language which emphasizes form and structure over the functional aspects like social contexts. This view might allude to theories that prioritize universal grammar and innate mechanisms of language acquisition. The sentence suggests a focus on abstract patterns and rules of languages without factoring in the cultural and societal nuances that affect language use. However, this perspective is criticized in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, which argue for language's embeddedness within social interactions and cultural contexts. These fields assert that understanding a language requires considering its use in communication, power dynamics, and as a part of cultural identity.
Moreover, there are various theories on language acquisition and cognitive development. For instance, Noam Chomsky's theory of a biological predisposition for language and the critical period hypothesis suggest innate capacities rather than environmental factors as the primary enablers of language development. While a solely structuralist perspective may disregard social factors, multidisciplinary approaches recognize language's complexity as both an inborn human ability and a sociocultural construct.