Final answer:
The sex-strike in Chi-raq was criticized for potentially oversimplifying the complex issues of violence and the feminist struggle for autonomy, similarly to how feminist movements have historically faced criticism for various reasons including radical approaches and inclusion of lesbian rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The criticism of the sex-strike in Chi-raq relates primarily to cultural and political responses to a form of non-violent protest depicted in a film. While the initial concept of the sex-strike to reduce violence through a unique form of protest might have seemed successful, it drew criticism for various reasons. Critics pointed to the historical context of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, suggesting that such strategies akin to the sex-strike simplifies the complex socio-political dynamics at play. Additionally, like feminist movements that faced pushback when including more radical elements such as lesbian rights, the sex-strike in Chi-raq was seen as controversial for its approach to solving societal issues.
Critics also highlighted that American foreign policy actions in Iraq, like the detainment of suspected terrorists without trial and reports of torture, had a significant impact on America's global standing and, as feared, might have driven recruits to terrorist organizations. The parallels between the sex-strike and other historic feminist strategies, which used both conservative and radical methods to advocate for their causes, are evident but the sex-strike in Chi-raq specifically attracted debate for possibly perpetuating stereotypes and oversimplifying the struggle against violence and for women's autonomy.