Final answer:
The correct answer is likely C) Willmott and Lee defend the film as necessary because typically, individuals defend a film by asserting its importance or relevancy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Without additional context, it's difficult to determine which film Willmott and Lee have defended, or the nature of the defense.
Typically, in a discussion about a film's defense, the individuals involved would assert that the film is of importance or relevancy, not that it is 'irrelevant' as one of the options suggests.
Therefore, and logically, we can infer that the correct answer is likely C) Willmott and Lee defend the film as necessary. However, without the specific details of the film or the arguments made by Willmott and Lee, it is challenging to provide a definitive answer.
For a nuanced discussion of the film's importance, one would need to consider the content, societal impact, and the arguments posed by Willmott and Lee in their defense of the work.