Final answer:
It is true that journalists should always double-check facts to ensure accuracy and maintain the integrity of their reporting. The rapid pace of online news and social media challenges make verification even more essential. Accuracy in journalism supports democracy and accountability.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is unequivocally true that journalists who care about accuracy should always double-check the facts. In the realm of journalism, maintaining factual integrity is paramount. The ever-increasing speed of online publication and the pressure to break news can lead to errors, which necessitates a rigorous fact-checking process. Platforms like social media can blur the lines between factual reporting and opinion, making the journalist's role in scrutinizing information even more crucial.
Additionally, the profession's commitment to truth and democratic values depends on the ability of journalists to accurately report on events and issues. For instance, as Christiane Amanpour regretted not covering Rwanda's genocide more effectively, it highlighted the crucial role of the media in shedding light on significant events. To avoid the pitfalls of misinformation, it is advisable that journalists cross-reference information, particularly when dealing with controversial issues, to ensure the credibility and reliability of their reports.