Final answer:
Without specific details, it is unclear exactly what the US ambassador reported. However, the report could address political stability, economic improvements, security, or human rights progress in line with the goals of U.S. foreign policy, which are integral to diplomatic relations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed does not have enough information to ascertain precisely what the US ambassador reported back to Washington about the situation in a specific country. However, based on the information provided about U.S. foreign policy goals, which include keeping the country safe, securing access to foreign markets, and protecting human rights, we can infer that the ambassador's report could potentially touch on all these aspects depending on the contemporary concerns and the state of the country in question.
Considering various historical examples, it is evident that the state of a nation's political stability, economic condition, and human rights record can directly influence diplomatic relations and the content of an ambassador's report. If we take examples from Latin America, we see instances where political instability, economic challenges, such as adopting the US dollar in Ecuador or high debt, and human rights violations have all been focal points in diplomatic discussions and reporting. In more recent times, there has been some progress in governmental and economic stabilization in various countries, yet political instability often remains a concern which U.S. foreign policy aims to address.
The specific situation mentioned about Jordan, where the government has worked to maintain a stable government despite economic challenges, could give us a context where an ambassador might be reporting positive aspects such as political stability or progress in human rights, as these align with the broad objectives of U.S. foreign policy.