Final answer:
The student's statement suggesting that AFCs primarily view cohabitation as a means to leave the SMP and avoid rejection is an oversimplified perspective. Cohabitation has a myriad of motivations, including testing compatibility for marriage, economic reasons, and accommodating personal goals like education and career. Overall, cohabitation has become a common part of relationship progression, and does not significantly impact marriage success.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement posits that average frustrated chumps (AFCs) view cohabitation primarily as a way to exit the Sexual Marketplace (SMP), limit rejection, and secure a consistent supply of intimacy. This view, however, is limited and doesn't reflect the broader range of reasons couples choose to live together or the evolving social views on cohabitation and marriage. Cohabitation is often seen as a trial run for marriage, with a significant percentage of couples viewing it as a direct step towards getting married.
Research indicates that cohabitation is increasingly common, particularly among 25- to 34-year-olds, and many times it results in marriage. Moreover, the claim that cohabitation solely serves to exit the SMP and limit rejection does not align with the data that suggests various other factors, such as saving on living costs and delaying marriage for education and career advancements, influence the decision to cohabit. It's also notable that cohabitation has little effect on the success of a marriage, contrary to some beliefs that living together before marriage might lead to better marital outcomes.